ÌÀÐÕÈ
ËÈ×ÍÛÉ ÊÀÁÈÍÅÒ ÑÒÓÄÅÍÒÀ
ÏÐÎÅÊÒÍÛÅ ÃÐÓÏÏÛ III ÊÓÐÑÀ 2024/2025 ó÷. ã.
Êîíêóðñ ïëàêàòîâ, ïîñâÿùåííûé 275-ëåòèþ Ìîñêîâñêîé àðõèòåêòóðíîé øêîëû
ÊÎÍÔÅÐÅÍÖÈÈ 2023-2024
Âûáîðû çàâåäóþùèõ êàôåäðàìè. Êîíêóðñ ÏÏÑ
2024 - ÃÎÄ ÑÅÌÜÈ
ÂÌÅÑÒÅ ÏÐÎÒÈÂ ÊÎÐÐÓÏÖÈÈ
ÔÀÊÓËÜÒÅÒ ÏÎÂÛØÅÍÈß ÊÂÀËÈÔÈÊÀÖÈÈ
ÍÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÛÉ ÏÐÎÅÊÒ "Íàóêà è Óíèâåðñèòåòû"
ÑÒÀƨРÌèíîáðíàóêè Ðîññèè
ÇÀÙÈÒÀ ÏÐÀÂ ÍÅÑÎÂÅÐØÅÍÍÎËÅÒÍÈÕ Â ÑÅÒÈ ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ


English version Russian version



ARCHITECTURE AND MODERN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC SCIENTIFIC - EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL


Article

RESTRICTED AVAILABILITY AREAS: SOME ASPECTS OF ARCHITECTURAL TYPOLOGY

Authors Y.S. Yankovskaya, E.R. Polyantseva, Moscow Institute of Architecture (State Academy), Moscow, Russia
Abstract

The article is devoted to the development of theoretical and metodologichesogo apparatus architectural typologies to describe the relationship of architectural and spatial models with a system of social norms and constraints. The paper focuses on the comprehensive review of the typology of space-planning decisions in terms of access control and security. The article defines the approaches to a safe buildings and complexes architectural design.

Keywords: architectural safety, limited access space, architectural typology, architectural and spatial models
article Article (RUS)
References

        1. Jeffery Ñ.R. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Beverly Hills, 1971, pp. 20–35 
 2. Newman O. Defensible Space: Crime Prevention through Urban Design. New York, 1972, pp. 30–46. 
 3. Brantingham P., Brantingham P. Environmental Criminology. Waveland Press, 1981, 282 p.
 4. Wilson J. Brokån Windows. Atlantic Monthly, 1982, March. Available at: http://www.manhattan-institute.org/pdf/_atlantic_monthly-broken_ windows.pdf 
 5. Clarke R.V. Situational Crime Prevention: Its Theoretical Basis and Practical Scope. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, 1983, no. 4, pp. 225-256. 
 6. Norberg-Schulz Cr. Existens, Space and Architecture. New York, 1971, pp. 20-43. 
 7. Kahn L. Harmony between man and architecture. Design Incorporating Indian Builder, 1974, Vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 23-29. 
 8. Gabrichevsky A.G. Morfologiya iskusstva [Morphology of art]. Moscow, 2002, 864 p. 
 9. Yavein O. I. Problema prostranstvennyh granic v arhitekture [Problem of spatial boundaries in architecture. (Cand. Dis)]. Moscow, 1982, 150 p. 
10. Lezava I.G. Funkciya I struktura formy v arhitekture [Function and structure of forms in architecture. (Cand. Dis. Thesis)]. Moscow, 1987, 280 p. 
11. Yankovskaya Y.S. Arhitekturnyi ob’ekt: jbraz I morfologiya [Architectural object image and morphology. (Cand. Dis. Thesis)]. Moscow, 2006, 302 p. 
      Polyantceva E.R. Arhitekturno-planirovochnye sredstva obespecheniya bezopasnosty grazdanskih zdaniy [Architectural and planning tools to ensure security of civil building
      (Cand. Dis. Thesis)]. St. Peterburg, 2016, 165 p.


Content of the journal